Eye on IP
| Vol. No. 2010 - Issue No. 2 |
February 2010 |
If you have a patent that issued since August 1, 2009, consider promptly submitting a request to the Patent Office to extend the patent term.
Most U.S. patents now expire 20 years from the effective filing date. That term is often extended due to delays in the Patent Office that are the fault of the Patent Office. A recent court decision determined that the Patent Office was not properly calculating the length of extensions due to delays by the Patent Office.
The Patent Office will be correcting these calculations. It is providing a one-time opportunity to request a recalculation of patent term. The request needs to be filed within 180 days of the patent issuance.
Patents that meet the following criteria are eligible for the extension of patent term:
- The application was actually filed on or after May 29, 2000; and
- Prosecution pendency of the application was greater than three years.
The vast majority of affected patents also show that the Patent Office delayed in examining the application during the first three years of pendency. The most likely delay is the Patent Office waiting more than 14 months before providing initial examination to the response.
Professor Crouch, Associate Professor of the University of Missouri School of Law, believes the additional term typically will be under one year. For some inventions this can be valuable. For example, many patents for drugs find their value toward the end of the term due to delays in regulatory approval from the FDA.
Accordingly, if you have a patent that meets this criteria, it is advisable to promptly contact your patent attorney to determine if it makes sense to seek an extension.
Sheldon Mak & Anderson Sponsors "Online Marketing Workshops for Today's Business Owner" |
Presented by Online Media Today, in conjunction with Silver Dove Productions, these FREE interactive workshops provide valuable education that gives participants a road map to their online marketing destination. Each event provides a great opportunity to talk with online marketing experts as well as network with other local business owners.
Join Sheldon Mak & Anderson for "Enterprise Social Media - The Fundamental Shift in Consumer Engagement".
| When: |
Thursday, February 18, 2010 |
| Where: |
Sheldon Mak & Anderson 100 Corson Street, Third Floor Pasadena, CA 91103 |
| Time: |
6:30pm - 9:00pm |
| Cost: |
FREE Workshop and Parking |
Seating is limited, so register today at:
www.onlinemediatoday.com/workshops.html or
www.meetup.com/online-media-today-internet-marketing-workshops.
If you do not want to receive future copies of the "Eye on IP" newsletter, please click the SafeUnsubscribe link below. If this
has been forwarded to you, and you wish to receive your own copy in the future, please notify Trina at
trina.chamberlain@usip.com with "subscribe" in the heading.
Sheldon Mak & Anderson provides the "Eye on IP" newsletter as a service to our clients and friends. It is designed only
to give general information on the developments actually covered. It is not intended to be a comprehensive summary of recent
developments in the law, treat exhaustively the subjects covered, provide legal advice or render a legal opinion.
|
|
| In This Issue |
|
Extending Patent Term
SMRA Recent Successes
SMRA Sponsors Online Marketing Workshop - Thursday, Feb. 18, 2010
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Mak & Anderson
Recent Successes
|
Economical Resolution to Copyright Suit
A client was recently sued for copyright infringement. We presented the plaintiff our analysis of the case, identifying its weak points. This quickly resulted in a settlement for significantly less than the original demand. Moreover, we were able to obtain insurance coverage for our client, so the insurance company paid most of the settlement and attorney fees.
|
License Agreement Dispute Economical Resolution
A client was sued by its licensee with regard to a license agreement. We arranged for prompt mediation, and as a result of the agreements we presented during the mediation, the plaintiff never served the complaint on our clients, instead dismissing the lawsuit. |
|
|